Thursday, December 24, 2009

Why we have pets

Andrew Sullivan posted this video today of a dog playing with an ice cube, another example of the simple joy of being alive. And watching it I thought, "This is why we desire the companionship of animals."

(Video link)

I was reminded of one of my favorite passages in all the books I've read. Tereza and Tomas are two of the central characters in Milan Kundera's The Unbearable Lightness of Being. From the beginning of their relationship, Tomas has had affairs. After many years of city life, they're now living in the country with their dog, Karenin. On a walk with Karenin, Tereza finds herself wondering why her attitude towards Karenin's menstruation is so different from her attitude toward her own. And why loving Karenin was so much easier than loving Tomas. Kundera's answer is that animals were never expelled from Paradise:

Raised as we are on the mythology of the Old Testament, we might say that an idyll is an image that has remained with us like a memory of Paradise: life in Paradise was not like following a straight line to the unknown; it was not an adventure. It moved in a circle among known objects. Its monotony bred happiness, not boredom....

Why is it that a dog's menstruation made her lighthearted and gay, while her own menstruation mader her squeamish? The answer seems simple to me: dogs were never expelled from Paradise. Karenin knew nothing about the duality of body and soul and had no concept of disgust. That is why Tereza felt so free and easy with him. (And that is why it is so dangerous to turn an animal into a machina animata, a cow into an automaton for the production of milk. By so doing, man cuts the thread binding him to Paradise and has nothing left to hold or comfort him on his flight through the emptiness of time....)

From this jumble of ideas came a sacrilegious thought that Tereza could not shake off: the love that tied her to Karenin was better than the love between her and Tomas. Better, not bigger. Tereza did not wish to fault either Tomas or herself; she did not wish to claim that they could love each other more. Her feeling was rather that, given the nature of the human couple, the love of man and woman is a priori inferior to that which can exist (at least in the best instances) in the love between man and dog, that oddity of human history probably unplanned by the Creator.

It is a completely selfless love: Tereza did not want anything of Karenin; she did not ever ask him to love her back. Nor had she ever asked herself the questions that plague human couples: Does he love me? Does he love anyone more than me? Does he love me more than I love him? Perhaps all the questions we ask of love, to measure, test, probe, and save it, have the additional effect of cutting it short. Perhaps the reason we are unable to love is that we yearn to be loved, that is, we demand something (love) from our partner instead of delivering ourselves up to him demand-free and asking for nothing but his company.

And something else: Tereza accepted Karenin for what he was; she did not try to make him over in her image; she agreed from the outset with his dog's life, did not wish to deprive him of it, did not envy him his secret intrigues. The reason she trained him was not to transform him (as a husband tries to reform his wife and a wife her husband), but to provide him with the elementary language that enabled them to communicate and live together.

Then too: No one forced her to love Karenin; love for dogs is voluntary....

But most of all: No one can give anyone else the gift of the idyll; only an animal can do so, because only animals were not expelled from Paradise. The love between dog and man is idyllic. It knows no conflicts, no hair-raising scenes; it knows no development. Karenin surrounded Tereza and Tomas with a life based on repetition, and he expected the same from them....

And therein lies the whole of man's plight. Human time does not turn in a circle; it runs ahead in a straight line. That is why man cannot be happy; happiness is the longing for repetition.

Yes, happiness is the longing for repetition, Tereza said to herself.

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

Blogger TomS said...

Michael,

Thank you for this. If I didn't know better, I might think you have read some of my posts, and know how much I love pets, and miss my Bassett Hound, Maggie.

We share a love for Kundera's book, too...I also think it was one of the best and most underrated films ever made.

I would love to hear from you.

Merry Christmas!

Tom

9:27 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home