Nate Silver's two cents on healthcare reform (and my nickel)
And nothing that's being debated right now gets to the root of the problem. As far as I'm concerned, if real reform is unobtainable right now (and I believe it is), then we'll have to take what we can get. The legislation now being considered would benefit me personally. And as I've told a number of gay friends this year who've been dismayed by the lack of progress made on LGBT issues: I'm a gay man, and I didn't vote for Obama because I thought he was going to make life better for me as a gay man. But I did hope that he'd do something about healthcare, and where I am in my life right now, that'd make a lot more of a difference for me.
So speaking unapologetically from the perspective of what works for me--and for a whole lot of other people: expanding access to the current broken healthcare system and preventing insurance companies from denying coverage in a bunch of ways that have been the norm up to now is a win. It's not a win where you go to the locker room and whoop it up about kicking some ass. It's a win where you go home thinking you were damned lucky to have pulled that one off.
Killing the bill because it's not perfect isn't a victory. It's a loss. A big one.
Here are links to some of Nate's recent posts: the elevator pitch, 20 questions for those who'd oppose the bill, and why progressives are nuts to oppose the Senate bill.
Labels: healthcare, LGBT, U.S. politics
1 Comments:
Yes, I must say I agree with the spirit and letter of your post. If the new bill really does provide the access it says it does, at an affordable cost, then I am for that.
Given the way the bill has evolved, and the compromises I'm hearing now, I don't trust that this will be the case if the bill is passed, not in any significant way.
I am losing confidence in the possible outcomes, because many in Congress are so well supported by the health and pharmaceutical industries, that there would seem to be little incentive to effect real competition to keep premiums down.
As I understand it, people will be mandated to buy insurance, or be fined...with few choices for affordable care....I just don't see how it represents meaningful change....
I think of folks who have lost their jobs this year...how soon can they expect to be covered under the new bill, and at what cost?
I want to remain optimistic... but my instincts tell me to fight a little more...so that we don't allow millions more into a broken system....
I am open to learning more, and appreciate your forum as a means to do so.
Thanks Michael.
Post a Comment
<< Home